The Alt-Right has been around for years, but was pushed into the spotlight by the election of President Donald Trump.

Because of Trump and ONLY because of Trump the term, or slur depending on who is using it,
Alt-Right is mainstream. Everyone knows what it is. It's an edgy anti-Boomer right-wing counter culture of mostly Millenials who are going to have to live in the cesspool of of what baby boomers are leaving us.

But with youth (in followers and as a movement) comes inexperience and certain susceptibilities that will ultimately halt the momentum the ALT-right has had in the last two years.

I plan to write an in depth post about the personnel problems among alt-right figures but for now it is important to address the central long term problem the movement does not realize is staring them right in the face.

To open up discussion on this pressing issue we need to ask what made the movement popular from the beginning? The truth? Black behavior? Jew behavior? Demographic decline? Was it podcasts, blogs, or YouTube videos?

The answer is none of the above. The White nationalist movement has had all of those elements for the better part of the last 25+ years. Sure, the internet increased the number of those who were interested in White identitarian propaganda by virtue of its availability but this alone was not what made "alt-right" nationally known. It was not what has gotten thousands of millenials out there on the forefront of the fight against White genocide.

It was trolling.

Yup, the "LULZ."  It was the memes, the making the heads of social justice warriors explode by digitally spitting in their face. It was Pepe the fucking frog.

Trolling campaigns behind neo-Nazi websites and targeted harassment campaigns against influential and misbehaving Jews was "fun." None of it was done because of any deeply held convictions as it pertains to matters of race and culture.

Recently, much attention and even monetary support have been given to people who existed outside of the realm of racial politics prior to jumping into the arena to fight White genocide and there's something particularly concerning about all of them.

This is the savior of the White race.....

One is this guy Baked Alaska. I don't know much about him other than he was adopted from Russia, likes to sport bang Asians and Monkoids, and worked for Buzzfeed.  I think I also saw videos of him rapping while wearing tin foil on his teeth like a nigger rapper while brown bitches rubber their ass on him. He's basically anti-SJW. He gained prominence in politics when he worked for Jewish book salesman Mike Cernovich. He Cernovich's social media planner or something of the like and eventually they had some sort of falling out and Alaska went on to go full red pill on the Jew issue.

He sounded like someone who had just awoken from a racial slumber. Suddenly he was using all the right terminology like "Jewish media" and "White genocide" while claiming to dedicate himself to fighting the genocide against his people. We had a brief encounter on Gab where I told him he wouldn't be saying these things for long as he has a long track record as a wigger who sport bangs brown bitches. He sees nothing wrong with that. He actually replied and said he would and how wrong I was and that I was a troll or what not.

It was obvious to me that Baked Alaska was somebody who thought he was getting on high tide wave. Cernovich was just a Jew using the Trump movement to sell his books. This is a guy who was attention starved. He wanted to be famous and would do anything to get there. People who knew him personally said as much in a profile piece some paper like the Washington post did on him. I smelled bullshit. A wigger with a track record of jumping on waves like a surfer poorly promoting pro-White talking points? I don't think so.

Then, Cernovich gave him a "talking to." Or maybe I should say a (((talking to))) and he renounced anti-semitism in a couple of weeks and went back to just being an edgy anti-SJW. No surprise for me since I'm always right and have incredible foresight.

Now he's back. The flames of the anti-Trump resistance are starting to fade and things are slowly getting back to normal. Now he has dedicated himself to the fourteen words and will be a full time White advocate, or so he says.

Why is Richard Spencer and other movement figures accepting him with open arms? Is it because he has a substantial Twitter following? What happens when he renounces it all again? What happens when it turns out he couldn't quit Asian pussy? What does that say about our movement?

Now I get the logic. View people as utilities to spread the message and pick up some ardent followers and supporters along the way. It's actually not a half bad strategy. However, the problem is that we are reaching a critical point where quality really matters over quantity. We don't need anymore podcasters or livestreamers. We don't need any more Pepe meme tweeters. We need people who will be prepared to pounce on the forthcoming opportunity the system is inevitably going to give us to undertake the task of effecting genuine change.

Is Baked Alaska going to take up arms to help establish the White Republic? Is he going to be comfortable forcing Jews and non-Whites to comply with our wishes? Is he going to be able to go without fucking diarrhea colored women?

Half Black girls with big tits are going to save the White race!

The same with this broad Brittany Venti. An obvious racial mongrel, but hey, she's got big tits andNorth West Front. Send it to some 25-year-old octoroon with big titties who says bizarre shit to a webcam because she posts pictures of herself in front of a "KEKistan" flag!
says anti-Jew things for her video game streaming followers! Send her your money White man! Don't send it to Harold Covington of the

Social movements work in waves. They replace one another. The religious right of the late 1980s and 1990s that upheld what we'd call political correctness, then and basic morality now was replaced by the sodomy and a multicultural counter culture which then went on to be the politically correct establishment. Now, we're in a situation where WE are the counter culture. When our thoughts can be expressed without consequence, what happens when 4chan and other trolls don't get LULZ off of attacking our enemies for us? What happens when weaponized autism is attacking us?

The biggest fear our movement needs to have is not of blacks, Jews, or green-haired dykes. It's what happens when we are THERE. What happens when we have the opportunity before us. Will we have an army of image board trolls and popular Tweeters? Or will we have an army of dedicated White men who live and bleed for the future of their children?

Johnny the Drunk didn't inhale, though.

The term "Cuckservative" has blasted upon the scene of the alternative right wing circuit.

The term is a well needed one given the status of modern conservatism. There are those freaks in the Evangelical wing who are obsessed with legislating people's sexual practices and the Neo-Conservative wing who are obsessed with sending young men to war on behalf of Israel's interests. On the outside of traditional conservative circles is a younger, vibrant and more modern conservative wing that is more fiscally and genetically responsible and less socially intrusive. They are those who an understanding that two repugnant men "marrying" one another is not going to induce a lake of fire and is a problem that can be dealt with later on.

To put it plainly the anti-Cucks are aggressive and unapologetic nationalist types who refuse to go along with the status quote Republican Party view of Conservatism.

Let us now take the time to identify five of the primary types of White Cuckservatives.

But like, muh black peeoplez!

The Only White in his family, including the dog.

White Genocide has officially been declared by President Mandela... I mean President Barack Hussein Obama. He has decided that it must be mandatory that White neighborhoods no longer be White neighborhoods anymore and that the Federal, Feral government must  force non-Whites into their neighborhoods. The video was posted to the official White House YouTube channel.

This is perhaps the biggest scandal of them all. The worst part? The right-wing mass media won't be standing up for what is right on this one. We're on our own.

Whites will always pick up and leave and move to a new area when too many blacks move in. There's nothing anyone can do to change that. White folk want to keep their neighborhoods looking nice, which means they can't have too many blacks around to fuck their neighborhoods up"

We're at  the two week mark of the Charleston Church killings by Dylann Roof and for some reason or another I cannot find a shred of sympathy within me.

I have seen the funeral of the pastor, I've seen the vigils outside the church, I've seen the media frenzy and fallout targeting white history and the Confederate flag and one single solitary tear has yet to fill my eye.

As recent as two years ago I would have said something along the lines of "this is such an awful tragedy and no solution to our problems. I so badly feel for the victims and their families."

Now, not so much. The fact of the matter is that I do not feel bad for the families. I do not feel bad for anyone at all and I'm not going to be politically correct and dishonest about how I feel. What's the sense in that?

To keep the FBI from monitoring me? To keep the verminous Jewish organizations from saying that deep down I am really thrilled 9 negroes were massacred and I'm just putting up a sympathy facade? They're doing these things already and will continue doing this regardless of what I write. It makes us no stronger to say how awful we feel. In fact it puts us in a weaker position socially to constantly wear faux emotions on our sleeves to be compliant adherents to the "cultural enrichment" manifesto.

Is this all today that I somehow feel elated that 9 church going coloreds were massacred? Nope. But you're going to think that already so go ahead and do it. I do not give a rat's ass. Is the world a better place now that Dylann Roof has erased three quarters of a dozen Bible scholars? Nope.

But I cannot bring myself to feel sorry or sympathetic.

I have sit back for the last three years and watched this country deteriorate because of political
correctness, kowtowing to feral negroe protestors, and "ambitious" political hacks in the judicial system as well as in local and national governments.

The "Negro Fiction" has anesthetized me to having a shred of compassion for the social scum of our day. The angelification of Trayvon Martin, the canonization of Michael Brown, the worship of gutter garbage Freddie Gray and Eric Garner has pushed me over the edge to realizing that we can no longer live in a society with these lifelong victims whose sole purpose is to get gains from our losses.  For over 50 years they have had an opportunity to allow us to judge them by the "content of their character" as Michael King Jr. and they have dropped the ball.

Don't confuse this with somehow rooting for police to kill these people. Don't confuse this with satisfaction over their deaths.

But lets be real, can anyone argue that the world is not a better place without the Mike Brown's of the world off the street? We saw his impulsive nature on CCTV and it was a matter of time before he exercised his impulse by raping one of our daughters. That's just an inconvenient truth.

Why should I feel bad over this situation? Why should I view it as a tragedy?

Just look at how the media has vilified Kyle Rogers for pointing out the fact that negroes are butchering whites on a daily basis, invading our homes, violating our person both sexually and financially. Jake Taper, Don Lemon, Rachel Maddow and the rest of the marionettes of the Jewish state sponsored media speak now word of the silent genocide of our people.

Maybe when it reaches the point when negroes are subtracting more whites from the world than whites are bringing into the world we can get a small 2x2 inch article in the New York Times. Until then, I shed no tears and I'm not going to lie about it to fixate my lips on the posterior of political correctness.

During the epic explosion of mass violence by exclusively negro's in Ferguson in 2014 there was something extremely peculiar about the Jewish media coverage of the event.

When chaos breaks out, there really is only one station to turn to to see a situation unfold and that is CNN, lead by Jewish President Jeff Zucker. While we would recommend abstinence from watching mainstream media channels, CNN is the place to go when the blacks "chimp out" as long as you make use of your mute button.

Before becoming the President CNN Worldwide in 2013, Jeff Zucker was creating the debacle of late night television programming and ruining NBC Universal's primetime lineup. He has since graduated to leading CNN in becoming the premier television programming specializing in anti-white hatred.

CNN was once billed as the last legitimate news source on cable television. To the right of MSNBC and to the left of FoxNews. Now, CNN has a cast of characters who root on cop killers, incessantly race-bait, and serve as apologists for destroyers.

Now back to the Ferguson riots.

In the midst of truly captivating coverage of the summer riots, the anchors and reporters getting tear-gassed (oy vey) and pushed around by militarized police, there was one person in particular who was being looked to as an "expert" along side long-time anti-white Marc Lamont Hill and that person was Malik Abdul Shabazz.

His voice was instantaneously recognizable and his appearance unforgettable. Between exaggerated coughs of Jew Jake Tapper, Shabazz, now of the "Black Lawyers for Justice," was playing peace keeper.  Wait-- Black Lawyers for Justice? That's not the Shabazz I know!

As it turns out, CNN was deliberately using a domestic terrorist from the New Black Panther Party, a group that implores American negroes to "kill white babies" and "bomb white nurseries" along with "killing little Johnnies and Penelopies," as an legitimate source of Black coverage.

No, we're not talking about someone in a crowd of hundreds having a microphone put in their mouth, we're talking about someone who gets multiple segments across multiple days with their own wired-up microphone and IFB getting a handshake from a CNN anchor and being referred to as "Mr. Shabazz."

At this point, there is no more to write, nothing more to articulate except one question. One question that CNN and Jeff Zucker, Jake Tapper, Don Lemon, and Chris Cuomo must answer. Why did you  think it was okay to give the domestic terrorist in the video below at least an hour of air time represented as a legitimate source?